UK time is: 15:27:46
Vital Login
Social Login

Choose your club

Other Sites

Network Navigation

Vital Partners

'If It's Football, It's Vital'

City Statement Says U`s 'Moved Goalposts`

Norwich City tonight accept they did break rules regarding Paul Lambert`s appointment nine months ago, but contend that Colchester United kept 'moving the goalposts` subsequently.

The Norfolk club have been hit with two separate bills, with 425,000 due direct to the U`s as payment for Lambert`s services by the football disciplinary committee. They own as much as a further 200,000 in fines payable to the Football League for breaking football League Regulation 20.

The Norwich City solicitor, Dan Chapman, has been overtly critical Colchester`s conduct in angling for a points deduction through the Football Association. He was reacting to news of the arbitration in an online edition of Canary-supporting paper, The Pink`un.

Clapham said: "We felt that Colchester failed to engage in the process of negotiation and continually 'moved the goalposts' in terms of what they were seeking and why, and the decision of the FDC has reflected that. Norwich City were in a position where they were bidding against themselves."

Robbie Cowling, meanwhile, yesterday maintained his bullish approach to City`s conduct as the correct one by saying he didn`t feel the sanctions imposed upon City were hard enough.

The U`s Chairman and owner however did say he had a "smile on his face" regarding the amount of compensation he understood was to be awarded to the Essex club.

Bookmark and Share


So what do you think?

Let us know with a comment below, or chat about this article in the forum. Not yet a member? Don't panic, click on the banner below to join in.




We want to know YOUR thoughts...


VITAL COLCHESTER; YOUR VOICE, YOUR CHOICE!


VITAL COLCHESTER IS 100% UNOFFICIAL - FOR THE FANS, BY THE FANS!









Use your social login to comment on front page articles. Login using you Facebook, Twitter, Google or LinkedIn accounts and have your say!



Click here to join in the debate on the club forum.

The Journalist

Writer: Matt_Us Mail feedback, articles or suggestions

Date:Tuesday June 1 2010

Time: 6:09PM

Your Comments (oldest first)

Change to most recent first
Of course they were bidding against themselves, considering what they were prepared to offer originally! 160k?!?! LOL
StevieG Col U
Report Abuse
03/06/2010 09:44:00

 

Have Your Say

Log in...
with your social network     OR     with your Vital account

Recent Colchester United Articles

Spurs Midfielder To Sign (Friday January 30 2015)

Thompson's Contract Cancelled (Thursday January 29 2015)

West Ham Defender Signs Permanently (Thursday January 29 2015)

Gorkss Contingency Plans In Place (Thursday January 29 2015)

Experience Matters (Wednesday January 28 2015)

A Couple More Go (Wednesday January 28 2015)

Striker Facing Six-Weeks Out (Wednesday January 28 2015)

League 1 - U's 2-0 Leyton Orient (Monday January 26 2015)

Stats: U's v Leyton Orient (Sunday January 25 2015)

Kpekawa Returns To QPR (Saturday January 24 2015)

Archived Colchester United Articles

List All Vital Colchester Articles
Have your say
Click here to suggest an article
Click here to suggest a poll

League Results (view all)

League Table (view table)

Team P W D L GD Pts
18. Coventry 27 7 9 11 -10 30
19. Barnsley 25 8 5 12 -4 29
20. Crewe 26 8 5 13 -19 29
21. Colchester 26 7 6 13 -11 27
22. Leyton Orient 26 6 8 12 -5 26
23. Yeovil 26 6 6 14 -18 24
24. Crawley 27 5 9 13 -22 24

Breaking League News

Preview: Crewe vs MK Dons
MK Dons : 30/01/2015 12:32:00
Ref Watch: Peterborough United v Yeovil Town
Peterborough : 30/01/2015 12:27:00
Smith Wants Loan Signing
Walsall : 30/01/2015 12:00:00
Bradford Match Moved Back A Day
Leyton Orient : 30/01/2015 12:00:00
DRFC Can Rovers continue good run?
Doncaster : 30/01/2015 12:00:00

Current Site Poll (view all polls)

Bradford v Colchester
Suggested By:  
Colchester win 25%
Bradford win 25%
Draw 50%