Colchester United - City Statement Says U`s 'Moved Goalposts`
UK time is: 22:17:38
Vital Login
Social Login

Choose your club

Other Sites

Network Navigation

Vital Partners

'If It's Football, It's Vital'

City Statement Says U`s 'Moved Goalposts`

Norwich City tonight accept they did break rules regarding Paul Lambert`s appointment nine months ago, but contend that Colchester United kept 'moving the goalposts` subsequently.

The Norfolk club have been hit with two separate bills, with 425,000 due direct to the U`s as payment for Lambert`s services by the football disciplinary committee. They own as much as a further 200,000 in fines payable to the Football League for breaking football League Regulation 20.

The Norwich City solicitor, Dan Chapman, has been overtly critical Colchester`s conduct in angling for a points deduction through the Football Association. He was reacting to news of the arbitration in an online edition of Canary-supporting paper, The Pink`un.

Clapham said: "We felt that Colchester failed to engage in the process of negotiation and continually 'moved the goalposts' in terms of what they were seeking and why, and the decision of the FDC has reflected that. Norwich City were in a position where they were bidding against themselves."

Robbie Cowling, meanwhile, yesterday maintained his bullish approach to City`s conduct as the correct one by saying he didn`t feel the sanctions imposed upon City were hard enough.

The U`s Chairman and owner however did say he had a "smile on his face" regarding the amount of compensation he understood was to be awarded to the Essex club.

Bookmark and Share

So what do you think?

Let us know with a comment below, or chat about this article in the forum. Not yet a member? Don't panic, click on the banner below to join in.

We want to know YOUR thoughts...



Use your social login to comment on front page articles. Login using you Facebook, Twitter, Google or LinkedIn accounts and have your say!

Click here to join in the debate on the club forum.

The Journalist

Writer: Matt_Us Mail feedback, articles or suggestions

Date:Tuesday June 1 2010

Time: 6:09PM

Your Comments (oldest first)

Change to most recent first
Of course they were bidding against themselves, considering what they were prepared to offer originally! 160k?!?! LOL
StevieG Col U
Report Abuse
03/06/2010 09:44:00


Have Your Say

Log in...
with your social network     OR     with your Vital account

Recent Colchester United Articles

Midfielder Loaned Out (Monday October 12 2015)

Shrewsbury 4-2 U's & Highlights (Monday October 12 2015)

Humes - We Should Have Done Better (Monday October 12 2015)

Stats: Shrewsbury Town v Colchester (Saturday October 10 2015)

Team Sheets - Shrewsbury v Colchester (Saturday October 10 2015)

League 1 - Shrewsbury v U's (Friday October 9 2015)

Archived Colchester United Articles

List All Vital Colchester Articles
Have your say
Click here to suggest an article
Click here to suggest a poll

League Table (view table)

Team P W D L GD Pts
9. Rochdale 12 5 2 5 2 17
10. Wigan 12 4 5 3 1 17
11. Port Vale 12 4 4 4 1 16
12. Colchester 12 4 4 4 -3 16
13. Barnsley 11 4 2 5 -1 14
14. Shrewsbury 12 4 2 6 -2 14
15. Scunthorpe 12 4 2 6 -2 14

Colchester United Fixtures (view all)

Breaking League News

Barnsley : 13/10/2015 21:45:01
Bradford : 13/10/2015 21:44:01
DRFC Former Owls and Blades boss favourite to take over
Doncaster : 13/10/2015 21:36:00
Allardyce: 'I Have A Few Irons In The Fire'
Blackpool : 13/10/2015 21:06:01
Frank Ford's Focus - League 1 Round Up
Wigan : 13/10/2015 15:05:00

Current Site Poll (view all polls)

Wigan v Colchester
Suggested By:  VitalU's
Colchester win 0%
Wigan win 0%
Draw 100%